![]() |
Photo credit: Free Carlos Celdran Facebook Page |
Activist Carlos Celdran
has been found
guilty of
the Damaso stunt he
pulled in September 2010. The man purportedly disrupted an ecumenical
religious service held at the Manila Cathedral and consequently “offended the
religious feeling” of the faithful in attendance.
Because of this, the
trial court found him guilty of violating Article 133 of the Revised Penal Code,
which punishes those who “in a place devoted to religious worship or during the
celebration of any religious ceremony shall perform acts notoriously offensive
to the feelings of the faithful.”
Celdran was thus sentenced to an
imprisonment of not less than 2 months and 21 days to not more than 1 year, 1
month and 11 days.
From the point of view of religious zealots, the
Damaso stunt may be misguided and offensive. But imprisoning the man for an
alleged offensive expression based on an outdated penal provision – a throwback
from the dark days of the friars – is simply regressive and probably
unconstitutional.